Showing posts with label Market. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Market. Show all posts

Thursday, January 29, 2015

10 Malaysian firms that made Forbes best under a billion


Forbes highlighted Asia-Pacific companies which are consistent performers and make under US$1 billion in sales last year. A simple analysis of these firms, according to sector:
  • Property development : KSL, Matrix Concept, Land & General, Tambun Indah Land, Sentoria
  • Construction/Infrastructure/Utilities : George Kent.
  • Oil & Gas : Dayang Enterprise
  • Telco: Time dotCom.
  • Insurance: Tune Ins.
  • Technology: Inari Amerton, Willowglen.
  • Engineering : Boilermech.
  • Education / Govt Training/ Software : Prestariang.
As we can see, Malaysian property developers  targeting middle-class home ownership (below RM 1 million) book the most sales in 2014. KSL is a big property player in Johor, while Matrix Concept is another property developer based in Negeri Sembilan. In terms of market capitalization, Dayang Enterprise is the most valuable in the list worth over USD 1.5 billion, with RM 4.2bil order book enough to last them until 2018.



http://bi-my-production.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/20140806114432/Forbes-BUB.png

Tuesday, November 04, 2014

All Ado about Hyperinflation, Inflation, Stagflation and Deflation.

What are they?

All of them are economic phenomenons.However, their impact on interest rates, purchasing prices and overall employment are vastly different.

Why does inflation happen?
  • Demand-pull factor: Too many dollars(demand), too few goods(supply). Strong consumer demand.
  • Cost-push factor: Increases in wages and raw materials cause production cost increases,hence goods prices to increase.

Why do they matter to business ? Why do they matter to the investor?
  • Inflation:
    • For businesses, inflation might be pushing the revenues up and overstating the earnings. Therefore, when an intelligent investor analyzes the financial statements, bear in mind the inflation and the technique used to value inventory.
    • For  fixed income investors, a rise in inflation will automatically affect your real return, i.e. purchasing power of your investment. If your return is 10% (nominal interest rate), but inflation is 4%, your real return is only 6% (real interest rate). Remember to look at the real interest rate, not the nominal interest rate, as so many investors OFTEN do!
    • If an unanticipated inflation happens, creditors lose, menu cost goes up, thus reducing spending and exporters are not competitive (due to high manufacturing cost).

Where are we now?

According to Bill Gross, we are at a cross road between inflation and deflation, as deflation potential concerns rise in Eurozone and Japan. The world is largely comfortable with inflation by introducing more money supply in the market, i.e. Quantitative Easing (QE) measures. Started by the Feds in the U.S, it was followed by ECB and now Japan's BOJ followed suit. Inflation is created to pay for the previous inflation, therefore deflation is not an option. Deflation would have stopped devaluing our currencies and hence our purchasing power, but no country in the world so entrenched in globalization and finance-based economy want to risk.

The magnitude of QE is huge, imagine USD  4,000,000,000,000 (4 million million dollars , or simply 4 trillion dollars) has been pumped into the US economy, not to mention USD 2 trillion in Japan and a trillion dollars by ECB. The money as we know it, was pumped into the system and did nothing but inflate prices of assets, not commensurate with their actual demand.If it was to increase productivity, innovation or even for infrastructure projects, it would have increased employment everywhere, and driven real demand-pull inflation. As Gross put it rightly ,"Prices go up, but not the right prices."

Wages remain stagnant in these countries; but more seriously soaring unemployment in Europe.Youth unemployment in more chronic in Europe - a staggering 21.7%, according to the latest census.

Stagnant wages everywhere... so where's the money? (Credit: IMF, Eurostat, Thomson Reuters.)



High youth unemployment rate. Where is their future? (Credit: Statista.com.)


Comparing unemployment in Europe and the non-Eurozone economies :
eurozone-unemployment
While Japan is able to control its unemployment throughout the years of deflation, US has managed to bring down the rate  officially. The same could not be said about Eurozone. (Credit: EconomicsHelp.org)


What are we to do?

In general, an intelligent investor's strategies should be :
  • To avoid timing the market
  • To build a diversified portfolio
There are also specific strategies during different economic phenomenons.

The investment strategies during Inflation & Hyperinflation:
a) Continue to invest in stocks ( buy value stocks and commodity-producing stocks)
b) Avoid bonds ( since bond prices and yield drops when interest rate rises)
c) For US-based investors, mutual funds such as the Treasury Inflation Protection Security(TIPS) can be an investment choice.
d) Real estates
e) Gold

The investment strategies during Stagflation:
a) Invest in 'real assets' whose growth is not dependent on a growing economy,e.g. commodities(gold) and real estates(sometimes).
b) Invest in defensive sectors - healthcare, education, utility, non-cyclical stocks.

The investment strategies during Deflation :
a) Avoid cash/stocks/real estates/commodities
b) Buy long-term bond fund for better yield
c) Invest in defensive sectors such as healthcare, education, food production, utilities, non-cyclical stocks


A summary of the write-up is presented here below:


In Conclusion

At the moment, we are experiencing the inflationary stage. But it's not a truly healthy one because, while the financial economy thrives, the real economy falters. Bill Gross notes that investors must recognize that in the modern day inflation, it is a not sufficient condition for increasing wealth at the rate necessary to beat real inflation rate and allow us to afford a comfortable education, healthcare and retirement.

Although money-printing pushes inflation up in the short run, it isn't a healthy phenomenon in the longer run. Money-spending in the right way is the only way we can get ourselves out of the rut, and that means spending from fiscal side (the government spending using taxpayers' money to create more jobs), something that governments across the world seem to fail to do due to a widening deficit in the budget. Gross notes that Jim Grant's (economic historian) prediction of a world deflation remains possible because of this, not in a good kind though : but "the kind that's trouble for prosperity".

Friday, October 24, 2014

Don't be a copycat of Buffett ?

This article shares what happens if you are fund manager and you copy the way Warren Buffett invests in companies such as IBM, Coco-Cola and Tesco.

Lesson #1: Unless you have a few billion dollars to spare, it's also good to heed this warning:

"For the world's third richest man, unrealized losses of a few billion dollars aren't necessarily anything to cry about.

Buffett's ability to sit tight and ride out short-term market gyrations has been one of the keys to his success as a long-term investor. And unlike, say, mutual fund managers, he doesn't have to worry about redemptions forcing him to sell stock."

Buffett's preferred holding time of forever is well known, with the so-called Oracle of Omaha an advocate of buy-and-hold strategies for everyone from himself through Mom-and-Pop retail investors. - See more at: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/business/article/buffett-copycats-risk-a-beating-as-berkshire-portfolio-suffers#sthash.U69lBWwf.dpuf
Lesson #2: Also, never panic sell:

"Buffett's preferred holding time of forever is well known, with the so-called Oracle of Omaha an advocate of buy-and-hold strategies for everyone from himself through Mom-and-Pop retail investors."

Lesson #3: And have courage when everyone else is running away:

"Tumbling markets can be helpful to the investor if he has cash available when prices get far out of line with values," he wrote in his annual letter to shareholders this year. "A climate of fear is your friend when investing; a euphoric world is your enemy.

Lesson #4 :It's always easier said than done :)

For the world's third richest man, unrealized losses of a few billion dollars aren't necessarily anything to cry about.
Buffett's ability to sit tight and ride out short-term market gyrations has been one of the keys to his success as a long-term investor. And unlike, say, mutual fund managers, he doesn't have to worry about redemptions forcing him to sell stock.
- See more at: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/business/article/buffett-copycats-risk-a-beating-as-berkshire-portfolio-suffers#sthash.U69lBWwf.dpuf
For the world's third richest man, unrealized losses of a few billion dollars aren't necessarily anything to cry about.
Buffett's ability to sit tight and ride out short-term market gyrations has been one of the keys to his success as a long-term investor. And unlike, say, mutual fund managers, he doesn't have to worry about redemptions forcing him to sell stock.
- See more at: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/business/article/buffett-copycats-risk-a-beating-as-berkshire-portfolio-suffers#sthash.U69lBWwf.dpuf

For the world's third richest man, unrealized losses of a few billion dollars aren't necessarily anything to cry about.
Buffett's ability to sit tight and ride out short-term market gyrations has been one of the keys to his success as a long-term investor. And unlike, say, mutual fund managers, he doesn't have to worry about redemptions forcing him to sell stock.
- See more at: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/business/article/buffett-copycats-risk-a-beating-as-berkshire-portfolio-suffers#sthash.U69lBWwf.dpuf

Thursday, October 23, 2014

Lessons from a Tech Venture Capitalist

I first read about Marc Andreesen when a post appeared on my phone one day about his resignation from the eBay Board. It must be a great deal, as otherwise it won't be a flash news. So I decided to check Marc out and also to understand why his departure was so influential.

So here's some interesting facts about Andreesen:
  • A co-developer in Mosaic, among the first widely used Web browsers, and as a co-founder of Netscape Communications Corp, the maker of the Netscape Navigator browser.
  • Sits on the board of big IT firms such as HP, eBay.. ( you might smell some conflicts of interest there)
  • Loathes Carl Icahn, another big name in the Silicon Valley. Addressed as an 'billionaire investor activist', Icahn often calls on large companies where he sits on the board or is a major shareholder (more than 5%) such as Apple to return cash to the shareholders when the management has no better idea on utilizing the funds than accumulating them OR conduct share buybacks to increase stock price. Andreesen loathes Icahn(owns 2.5% of eBay) because he does not add value to the companies, and most of the time only suggests breaking companies up for shareholders' benefits, and even nicknamed him "the evil Captain Kirk" of the Star Trek series.
  • While Marc respects Warren Buffett's stature in the investing world, he thinks Buffett is really wrong about Bitcoin's future. He also thinks since Buffett is no authority in the world of tech, those opinions do not count and called Buffett "an old white man crapping on new technology they don't understand." Perhaps it's because Warren sees Bitcoin as nothing more than another method of transferring money, not unlike cheque, money order, online transfers and what-have-you that banks are doing at the moment, therefore calling it a "mirage".
  • He thinks that the three most important tech trends are Bitcoin (cryptocurrency that's been a craze lately), online education and healthcare & technology.


And why did Andreesen quit eBay then? Was it because he felt like he had no more influence in the Board and the company's future? Andreesen saw eBay's decision to spin off PayPal as the straw that broke the camel's back after Icahn(another major shareholder of the company) managed the company to go for the spinoff after a long time. Of course, Icahn also accused Andreesen of having a conflict of interest when eBay sold Skype to a group of private investors, Andreesen venture capital firm included, for USD 1.9B ( fair valued at USD 2.75B). Skype was eventually sold to Microsoft for three times that price 18 months later at USD 8.5B, which infuriated Icahn !

Let's look into the reason why eBay spins off PayPal finally, when earlier efforts showed that it was spending time convincing shareholders otherwise. Icahn describes PayPal as a "jewel" and should pursue its outright sale while progressing on the plan of separating its payment from its online marketplace business.  Do not forget that Icahn owns 53 million shares of Apple ( and in today's value USD 5.45 billion dollars). So, just imagine if ApplePay eventually catches on the US market (and eventually adopted elsewhere globally, although personally I don't think it would come to Malaysia), Icahn stands to profit from it handsomely. His sentiments are shared by Elon Musk , the cofounder of PayPal and is also a CEO of Tesla.Icahn and Musk do not agree with eBay's strategy to keep PayPal as a fantastic business under wraps, seeing that online payment market is becoming more crowded with ApplePay coming into play, Amazon or some start-ups.

With Andreesen's departure from eBay, possibly it's because there's no more jewels in the company to be plundered and sold to VCs of his likeness anymore after Skype and PayPal. He's better off elsewhere with his wealth and influence. What will happen to eBay after this? We don't know and it's certainly worth watching.

The saga in Silicon Valley is bound to continue. Definitely better than the dramas on Astro these days. 


Sunday, October 19, 2014

Attacking Stocks? Defending Stocks?

Definition:


  • Attacking stocks are the types of stocks that are used for trading ( short term ).
  • Defending stocks are the types of stocks that are used for investing ( long term).


Which stock can be used as an attacking stock and which stock should be your defending stock? Going further, which stock can be used for both purposes? How do we differentiate them? Something for us to ponder....

Thursday, October 16, 2014

How Warren Buffett defines Risk?

If you mention Buffett's quote above to most people, you'll likely get a nod that says "oooh, that's deep". But if you ask them what they think it means, you will likely get confused stares.

In this article, I will explain what Buffett means when he says risk comes from ignorance. In fact, this quote reveals the way we see risk, and how he sees it differently from how many other people see risk.


Shortcomings Of The Traditional Measure Of Risk

 

As readers of my free book know, investment professionals normally measure risk using standard deviation. Standard deviation basically measures the degree of ups and downs of a stock. For example, if a stock goes up or down by roughly 5% every day, that stock has a higher standard deviation than a stock that goes up or down by 1% every day.

Most investment professionals see stocks with higher standard deviation as carrying higher risk. To understand why, imagine that you had to sell your stocks tomorrow. Do you feel safer holding stocks that might go down 5%? Or do you feel safer holding stocks that might go down just 1%?

Even if you don't intend to sell your stocks tomorrow or even the next month or year, the value of your holdings is measured by how much they would sell for at today's prices. Most people start to feel anxious if the value of their holdings goes up and down dramatically.

However, Warren Buffett fundamentally disagrees with this definition of risk. In Berkshire Hathaway's 2007 annual meeting, he had this to say.
It's nice, it's mathematical, and wrong. Volatility (i.e. standard deviation) is not risk. Those who have written about risk don't know how to measure risk. Past volatility does not measure risk. When farm prices crashed, [farm price] volatility went up, but a farm priced at $600 per acre that was formerly $2,000 per acre isn't riskier because it's more volatile. - Warren Buffett
Let me explain what he means.

Let's say you had a farm, and you could reasonably expect to make $200/acre every year using the land. Let's say that for many years, the price of the farm fluctuated around $1,900 to $2,100. In other words, it exhibited low standard deviations.

However, let's say that one year, prices became very volatile and farm prices crashed to $600. However, in the long term, the farm is still expected to generate $200/acre every year.

Here's the question: Is the farm riskier because its price crashed to $600?

If you measured risk by standard deviation, the answer would be yes. However, common sense would tell us that far from being riskier, the farm was actually a lot less risky as an investment.

If you could buy the farm at $600, then it wouldn't actually take much to generate a healthy return on your investment. For example, even if the farm became decidedly less profitable and only generated $50/acre every year, the farm would still prove to be a good investment that returns above 8% per year. However, if you had bought the farm at $2,000, then $50/acre a year would represent poor returns on investment.


A Safe Company That Looked Risky

 

What applies to farms applies to corporations as well. I'll give you a real example.

In late 2008, as the stock market crashed, a tiny company called Coopers Park saw its stock prices crash as well. Its stock price went from around 70 cents a share in late 2007, to just 5 cents a share by the end of 2008 - a 93% loss. As if that wasn't enough, by April 2009, the stock hit a low of 2 cents a share, a 60% loss from the end of 2008 and a 97% loss since late 2007. At this point, the company was valued at just $1.8 million.

If you measured the riskiness of this company using standard deviation, the risk level would have been off the charts. However, if you bothered to look at their financial statements and used some common sense, you would have seen that this company was about the safest investment you could make.

If you read the financial statements, you will have noticed a few things on their balance sheet (i.e. their list of assets and debts). At the end of March 2009, they carried $39 million worth of property and $46 million in cash. Against this, the company had $9 million in accounts payable (i.e. short term debt) and $5.4 million in taxes payable. The company carried no other debt.

In other words, if the company paid off all their debt and taxes, they would still have been left with some $32 million dollars in cash alone, not to mention the $39 million in property! Yet the whole company was trading for under $2 million.

Nothing is safer than cash. Unless they're lying about how much cash they had in the bank, this was possibly the safest investment you could make at the time. (For the record, Coopers Park shares rose back above 70 cents, and yes, I made some money on the way up).


The True Source Of Risk 

 

Buffett argues that if you intend to hold an investment for a long time, it doesn't make sense to measure risk by standard deviation. If you're not going to sell your investments anytime soon, what prices do in the near term should have no bearing on risk.

Instead, Buffett makes the case that risk really comes from possible deterioration of business fundamentals.

As an example, Buffett sometimes quotes his example of Dexter Shoes. In summary, Buffett bought Dexter thinking that the shoe company will continue to generate healthy profits. Unfortunately, competition from overseas led to a price war, which Dexter lost.

When you think about such business risks, you realize that you can anticipate, or at least become aware of such risks. This becomes clear when you think about the major businesses you know that have declined in value, and understand why they declined in value.

For example, Blackberry's business dramatically declined because they failed to keep up with the competition. But the warning signs were clearly there long before the stock price declined. In 2008 when Blackberry stocks were flying high, many analysts were writing about the potential disruption from Apple's iPhone. Someone like Buffett would never have bought Blackberry shares, because competition clouded the future of the company. In other words, there was risk in not knowing what the future looked like. It's the same reason why I won't touch Apple shares today.

The same goes for Yellow Pages, now called Yellow Media. Back in the day, Yellow Pages possessed a very profitable natural monopoly. But anyone with an internet connection could see that Yellow Pages' bread and butter business was at risk.

As a final example, think about Enron. While the general populace was loading up on Enron shares, people like Jim Chanos did his due diligence and actually bet against the company. Through careful scrutiny of financial statements, he could see that Enron was a scam.

Therefore, for the long term shareholder, most of the risk from buying stocks didn't come from completely unexpected turns of events. But rather, it comes from not doing the proper due diligence and not understanding the business completely. This is what Buffett means when he says that "Risk comes from not knowing what you're doing".


Why We Still Use Standard Deviation

 

If you've read this far, you might wonder: if I really believe this, then why do I talk about standard deviation as a measure of risk in my free book as well as my free course? I do it for 2 reasons.

First, in general (but not always), risky stocks come with high standard deviations. If you look at J C Penney, for example, its stock price moves up and down quite violently (i.e. has high standard deviations). That's because as J C Penny oscillates between making profit and losing money, the opinion on the company shifts often.

Second, while I believe short term price fluctuations don't matter, I recognize that most people have trouble thinking the same way. Most people do feel anxious when stock prices take a temporary hit, which often causes them to make bad decisions. For example, during the depth of the financial crisis, many people sold their stocks out of fear, though they should have been buying stocks instead.

I don't want to ignore the emotional reality of people, which is why I try to optimize the portfolios in such way that the portfolios don't move up and down very much. That's why I will continue to pay attention to standard deviation, even though quite frankly, I don't care about it much for my own portfolio.

Credits: http://www.moneygeek.ca/weblog/2014/08/28/how-warren-buffett-defines-risk/

Trader vs Investor

My take?

Trader :
  • no-money-down operations. 
  • Share holder until the time is ripe. Might be just a few seconds/minutes/hours/days. 
  • Sell or short the stocks(borrow stocks and sell them) when the trading floor trend says so. 
  • Has more courage than investors because they dare to make decisions quick, in seconds/minutes/hours/days.

Investor :
  • money-down for the long run. 
  • Share owner from minutes to eternity. 
  • Long the stocks when everyone else is selling. 
  • Has a lot of courage to wait it out til the storm is over.

Who's buying when everyone's selling?

While everyone is busy selling, someone must be buying right? So here's the list.

Credits: klse-quantitative.blogspot.com/2014/10/quantitative-analysis-who-is-buying.html?spref=fb


Name
Share Holder Name
Monitor
Is Director?
Detail
Price


SHARE BUY BACK
Y
-
$272,793,483 (0%)
4.01 (0.25%)

-68,028,300

SHARE BUY BACK
N
-
$0 (0%)
3.75 (-1.06%)

-

SHARE BUY BACK
N
-
$53,760 (0%)
1.28 (-0.78%)

-42,000

SHARE BUY BACK
N
-
$176,400 (280%)
0.63 (-1.56%)

100,000 - 380,000

SHARE BUY BACK
N
-
$122,550 (42.06%)
0.215 (2.38%)

1,355,200 - 1,925,200

SHARE BUY BACK
N
-
$352,503 (7.53%)
1.59 (2.58%)

2,944,800 - 3,166,500

SHARE BUY BACK
N
-
$802,000 (4.61%)
4.01 (-1.96%)

4,341,400 - 4,541,400

SHARE BUY BACK
N
-
$590,700 (4.57%)
3.3 (0.3%)

3,920,400 - 4,099,400

SHARE BUY BACK
N
-
$56,500 (3.85%)
1.13 (-2.59%)

1,298,900 - 1,348,900

SHARE BUY BACK
N
-
$3,510.5 (1.96%)
0.295 (0%)

605,700 - 617,600

SHARE BUY BACK
N
-
$111,699 (0.88%)
0.315 (0%)

40,300,400 - 40,655,000

SHARE BUY BACK
N
-
$19,600 (0.73%)
2.8 (0%)

953,000 - 960,000

SHARE BUY BACK
N
-
$63,270 (0.68%)
1.14 (0.88%)

8,215,300 - 8,270,800

SHARE BUY BACK
N
-
$29,400 (0.21%)
1.68 (-0.59%)

8,418,766 - 8,436,266

SHARE BUY BACK
N
-
$75,600 (0.13%)
1.8 (1.69%)

32,966,781 - 33,008,781

NG BACK TENG
Y
Y
Direct
0.745 (-0.67%)

Open Market Acquisition

Aquire RM29,840

$14,305,591.32 (0%)

-19,202,136

NG BACK TENG
Y
Y
Direct
0.745 (-0.67%)

Open Market Acquisition

Aquire RM29,840

$0 (0%)

19,202,136 - 19,202,136

KUMPULAN WANG PERSARAAN (DIPERBADANKAN) ('KWAP')
Y
N
Direct
4.69 (-0.21%)

(1) Purchase of shares in open market by KWAP's Fund Manager-348900 shares

Aquire RM1,625,874

Aquire RM2,096,534

Aquire RM419,190

$5,867,190 (2.32%)

53,906,000 - 55,157,000

EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND BOARD
Y
N
Direct
4.69 (-0.21%)

Acquired by Citigroup Nominees (Tempatan) Sdn Bhd

Aquire RM300,027

$298,753 (0.11%)

58,132,700 - 58,196,400

CHEW KONG YOON
N
Y
Direct
0.285 (0%)

Married Deal

Aquire RM500,000

$23,043,645.36 (0%)

-80,854,896

DATIN LOW WEE CHIN
N
Y
Indirect
1.46 (-0.68%)

Deemed interest by virtue of the indirect interest of her spouse Dato' Ng Chin Heng.

Aquire RM68,540

Aquire RM15,100

Aquire RM119,441

Aquire RM44,400

$60,623,184.34 (0%)

-41,522,729

DATO' KHO POH ENG
N
Y
Direct
1.66 (0.61%)

Purchase from Open Market

Aquire RM243,972

$63,394,684.54 (0%)

-38,189,569

DATO' LEE YEOW CHOR
N
Y
Indirect
2.5 (-3.85%)

Purchase of shares by Vertical Capacity Sdn Bhd from the open market.

Aquire RM3,838,500

Aquire RM4,078,400

Aquire RM6,928,200

$3,935,148,142.5 (0%)

-1,574,059,257

DATO' NG CHIN HENG
N
Y
Indirect
1.46 (-0.68%)

Deemed interest by virtue of the interest of his parent Datin Chan Soon @ Chan Lai Har.

Aquire RM15,100

Aquire RM44,400

Aquire RM119,441

Aquire RM68,540

$60,623,184.34 (0%)

-41,522,729

DATO' SRI LIM HOCK SAN
N
Y
Direct
1.6 (-1.23%)

Open Market Purchase

Aquire RM32,400

Aquire RM182,574

$0 (0%)

-

DATO' SRI LIM HOCK SAN
N
Y
Direct
1.6 (-1.23%)

Open Market Purchase

Aquire RM32,400

Aquire RM182,574

$460,800,736 (0%)

-288,000,460

DATO WONG KUO HEA
N
Y
Indirect
3.76 (0%)

Deemed interested by virtue of his and his spouse's substantial shareholdings in Mountex Satu Sdn. Bhd.

Aquire RM17,625

Aquire RM376

Aquire RM1,496

$16,689,433.04 (0%)

-4,438,679

DATUK AMAR ABDUL HAMED BIN HAJI SEPAWI
N
Y
Indirect
3.76 (0%)

Deemed interested by virtue of his substantial shareholdings in Mountex Satu Sdn. Bhd.

Aquire RM1,496

Aquire RM17,625

Aquire RM376

$16,689,433.04 (0%)

-4,438,679

GAN SIEW LIAT
N
Y
Indirect
0.76 (-3.8%)

Purchase of shares in open market by Inter Merger Sdn Bhd

Aquire RM772,000

Aquire RM407,500

$272,896,566.04 (0%)

-359,074,429

IR LEE SWEE ENG
N
Y
Indirect
0.76 (-3.8%)

Purchase of shares in open market by Inter Merger Sdn Bhd

Aquire RM407,500

Aquire RM772,000

$284,884,343.2 (0%)

-374,847,820

JOHAN ZAINUDDIN BIN DZULKIFLI
N
Y
Direct
0.76 (0.66%)

Conversion of the RCULS into New Ordinary Shares of RM0.25 each

Other RM24,709,073.75

$153,306,446.84 (0%)

-201,719,009

JOHAN ZAINUDDIN BIN DZULKIFLI
N
Y
Other RM32,945,431.415
0.76 (0.66%)

Other RM24,709,073.75

$-153,306,446.84 (0%)

201,719,009 -

JOHAN ZAINUDDIN BIN DZULKIFLI
N
Y
Direct
0.76 (0.66%)

Conversion of the RCULS into New Ordinary Shares of RM0.25 each

Other RM32,945,431.415

$153,306,446.84 (0%)

-201,719,009

LAU MONG FAH
N
Y
Direct
1.43 (-2.72%)

Open market purchases

Aquire RM11,760

$12,209,840.5 (0%)

-8,538,350

LEE YEOW SENG
N
Y
Indirect
2.5 (-3.85%)

Purchase of shares by Vertical Capacity Sdn Bhd from the open market.

Aquire RM6,928,200

Aquire RM4,078,400

Aquire RM3,838,500

$3,929,313,392.5 (0%)

-1,571,725,357

NG KWENG CHONG
N
Y
Direct
4.02 (-1.47%)

Open market purchases via Glencare Sdn Bhd

Aquire RM12,540

Aquire RM12,240

Aquire RM12,660

$246,121,107.12 (0%)

-61,224,156

RAYMOND NG YEW FOONG
N
Y
Indirect
1.46 (-0.68%)

Deemed interest by virtue of the indirect interest of his parent Dato' Ng Chin Heng.

Aquire RM119,441

Aquire RM44,400

Aquire RM15,100

Aquire RM68,540

$60,623,184.34 (0%)

-41,522,729

ROY HO YEW KEE
N
Y
Direct
0.85 (0%)

ACQUISITION

Aquire RM359,480

$355,300 (0%)

-418,000

TAING KIM HWA
N
Y
Direct
2.1 (0.48%)

Share Dividend via a distribution of Treasury Shares on the basis of one (1) Treasury Share for every one hundred (100) ordinary shares of RM0.50 each held in WCT Holdings Berhad

Other RM48,736.48

Other RM4,323,800

$445,872,858.9 (0%)

-212,320,409

TAN SRI DATO' LEE SHIN CHENG
N
Y
Indirect
2.5 (-3.85%)

Purchase of shares by Vertical Capacity Sdn Bhd from the open market.

Aquire RM6,928,200

Aquire RM3,838,500

Aquire RM4,078,400

$4,136,117,705 (0%)

-1,654,447,082

TEONG TECK LEAN
N
Y
Direct
1.71 (-5%)

Acquisition of shares via open market

Aquire RM100,576

$601,046,911.62 (0%)

-351,489,422

TERENCE SELVARAJAH A/L PETER SELVARAJAH
N
Y
Direct
0.13 (-3.7%)

Purchase of shares from the open market

Aquire RM6,750

$6,500 (0%)

-50,000

NG KOK KHUAN
N
Y
Direct
4.02 (-1.47%)

Open market purchases via Glencare Sdn Bhd

Aquire RM12,240

Aquire RM12,660

Aquire RM12,540

$36,180 (3.54%)

254,013 - 263,013

CHOE KAI KEONG
N
Y
Direct
2.1 (0.48%)

Share Dividend via a distribution of Treasury Shares on the basis of one (1) Treasury Share for every one hundred (100)ordinary shares of RM0.50 each held in WCT Holdings Berhad

Other RM65,451.36

$66,080.7 (1%)

3,146,753 - 3,178,220

DATO' CAPT. AHMAD SUFIAN @ QURNAIN BIN ABDUL RASHID
N
Y
Direct
2.1 (0.48%)

Share Dividend via a distribution of Treasury Shares on the basis of one (1) Treasury Share for every one hundred (100)ordinary shares of RM0.50 each held in WCT Holdings Berhad

Other RM447.2

Other RM19,500

$20,139 (1%)

959,000 - 968,590

GOH CHIN LIONG
N
Y
Direct
2.1 (0.48%)

Share Dividend via a distribution of Treasury Shares on the basis of one (1) Treasury Share for every one hundred (100)ordinary shares of RM0.50 each held in WCT Holdings Berhad

Other RM141,797.76

$143,161.2 (1%)

6,817,238 - 6,885,410

LIANG KAI CHONG
N
Y
Direct
2.1 (0.48%)

Share Dividend via a distribution of Treasury Shares on the basis of one (1) Treasury Share for every one hundred (100) ordinary shares of RM0.50 each held in WCT Holdings Berhad

Other RM75,897.12

Other RM4,867.2

$81,540.9 (1%)

3,882,976 - 3,921,805

WONG SEWE WING
N
Y
Direct
2.1 (0.48%)

Share Dividend via a distribution of Treasury Shares on the basis of one (1) Treasury Share for every one hundred (100) ordinary shares of RM0.50 each held in WCT Holdings Berhad

Other RM8,195.2

Other RM4,323,800

$4,373,649 (1%)

208,269,104 - 210,351,794

WONG YIK KAE
N
Y
Direct
2.1 (0.48%)

Share Dividend via a distribution of Treasury Shares on the basis of one (1) Treasury Share for every one hundred (100)ordinary shares of RM0.50 each held in WCT Holdings Berhad

Other RM1,572.48

$1,587.6 (1%)

75,605 - 76,361

HO PHON GUAN
N
Y
Direct
2.49 (-6.04%)

Purchase of shares in the open market

Aquire RM185,500

Aquire RM265,762

$404,874 (0.61%)

26,537,908 - 26,700,508

DATO' NG TIONG SENG
N
Y
Indirect
1.46 (-0.68%)

Deemed interest by virtue of the interest of his spouse Datin Chan Soon @ Chan Lai Har.

Aquire RM119,441

Aquire RM68,540

Aquire RM15,100

Aquire RM44,400

$241,046 (0.4%)

41,357,629 - 41,522,729

NG CHIN LOONG
N
Y
Indirect
1.46 (-0.68%)

Deemed interest by virtue of the interest of his parent Datin Chan Soon @ Chan Lai Har.

Aquire RM119,441

Aquire RM15,100

Aquire RM68,540

Aquire RM44,400

$241,046 (0.4%)

41,357,629 - 41,522,729

CHEW KONG YOON
N
Y
Direct
0.285 (0%)

Married Deal

Aquire RM500,000

$0 (0%)

80,854,896 - 80,854,896

DATIN LOW WEE CHIN
N
Y
Indirect
1.46 (-0.68%)

Deemed interest by virtue of the indirect interest of her spouse Dato' Ng Chin Heng who is the son of Datin Chan Soon @ Chan Lai Har.

Aquire RM44,400

Aquire RM68,540

Aquire RM15,100

Aquire RM119,441

$0 (0%)

41,522,729 - 41,522,729

DATO' LEE YEOW CHOR
N
Y
Indirect
2.5 (-3.85%)

Purchase of shares by Vertical Capacity Sdn Bhd from the open market.

Aquire RM3,915,000

Aquire RM7,020,000

Aquire RM4,112,000

$-121,250 (0%)

1,574,059,257 - 1,574,010,757

DATO' NG CHIN HENG
N
Y
Indirect
1.46 (-0.68%)

Deemed interest by virtue of the interest of his parent Datin Chan Soon @ Chan Lai Har.

Aquire RM15,100

Aquire RM68,540

Aquire RM119,441

Aquire RM44,400

$0 (0%)

41,522,729 - 41,522,729

DATO WONG KUO HEA
N
Y
Indirect
3.76 (0%)

Deemed interested by virtue of his and his spouse's substantial shareholdings in Mountex Satu Sdn. Bhd.

Aquire RM17,625

Aquire RM376

Aquire RM1,496

$0 (0%)

4,438,679 - 4,438,679

DATUK AMAR ABDUL HAMED BIN HAJI SEPAWI
N
Y
Indirect
3.76 (0%)

Deemed interested by virtue of his substantial shareholdings in Mountex Satu Sdn. Bhd.

Aquire RM376

Aquire RM17,625

Aquire RM1,496

$0 (0%)

4,438,679 - 4,438,679

GAN SIEW LIAT
N
Y
Indirect
0.76 (-3.8%)

Purchase of shares in open market by Inter Merger Sdn Bhd

Aquire RM407,500

Aquire RM772,000

$0 (0%)

359,074,429 - 359,074,429

IR LEE SWEE ENG
N
Y
Indirect
0.76 (-3.8%)

Purchase of shares in open market by Inter Merger Sdn Bhd.

Aquire RM772,000

Aquire RM407,500

$0 (0%)

374,847,820 - 374,847,820

LAU MONG FAH
N
Y
Direct
1.43 (-2.72%)

Open market purchases

Aquire RM11,760

$0 (0%)

8,538,350 - 8,538,350

LEE YEOW SENG
N
Y
Indirect
2.5 (-3.85%)

Purchase of shares by Vertical Capacity Sdn Bhd from the open market.

Aquire RM3,915,000

Aquire RM4,112,000

Aquire RM7,020,000

$0 (0%)

1,571,725,357 - 1,571,725,357

RAYMOND NG YEW FOONG
N
Y
Indirect
1.46 (-0.68%)

Deemed interest by virtue of the indirect interest of his parent Dato' Ng Chin Heng who is the son of Datin Chan Soon @ Chan Lai Har.

Aquire RM44,400

Aquire RM119,441

Aquire RM15,100

Aquire RM68,540

$0 (0%)

41,522,729 - 41,522,729

TAING KIM HWA
N
Y
Direct
2.1 (0.48%)

Share Dividend via a distribution of Treasury Shares on the basis of one (1) Treasury Share for every one hundred (100) ordinary shares of RM0.50 each held in WCT Holdings Berhad

Other RM4,323,800

Other RM48,736.48

$0 (0%)

212,320,409 - 212,320,409

TEONG TECK LEAN
N
Y
Direct
1.71 (-5%)

Acquisition of shares via open market

Aquire RM100,576

$0 (0%)

351,489,422 - 351,489,422

NG KWENG CHONG
N
Y
Direct
4.02 (-1.47%)

Open market purchases via Glencare Sdn Bhd

Aquire RM12,540

Aquire RM12,660

Aquire RM12,240

61,224,156 - 61,199,636

TAN SRI DATO' LEE SHIN CHENG
N
Y
Indirect
2.5 (-3.85%)

Purchase of shares by Vertical Capacity Sdn Bhd from the open market.

Aquire RM4,112,000

Aquire RM3,915,000

Aquire RM7,020,000

1,654,447,082 - 1,653,300,634

DATO' KHO POH ENG
N
Y
Direct
1.66 (0.61%

Purchase from Open Market

Aquire RM243,972

38,189,569 - 37,719,569